Packers GM Brian Gutekunst makes case for drafting a QB in the 1st round

https://sports.yahoo.com/packers-gm-brian-gutekunst-makes-case-for-drafting-a-qb-in-the-first-round-023026306.html

Brian Gutekunst isn’t shy about discussing Aaron Rodgers’ replacement.

The second-year Green Bay Packers general manager said in January that he’d never pass up a chance to draft a quarterback who can start in the NFL.

On Friday, he hammered that point home while telling Packers beat writers that he’d even consider using a first-round pick in this year’s draft to select a quarterback.

‘It’s a good crop this year’

“Sure,” Gutekunst told reporters when asked if he’d take a quarterback with the No. 30 pick. “You guys have heard me say this before. Everything I’ve been taught, that’s where you start — you start with the quarterback. So, you evaluate them every year, and I think it’s always on the table.

“It’s a good crop this year. It’s a good group of quarterbacks. I think it’s a little deeper than it has been in the past. It will be interesting. But yeah, sure.”

Gutekunst’s strategy begs the question: You know you’ve got Aaron Rodgers, right?

Why not improve elsewhere?

At 36, Rodgers is on the decline. But he just came off a Pro Bowl season that saw the Packers finish with the second-best record in the NFC and advance to the NFC championship game. He’s not at the peak of his game, but he’s still one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL.

And granted, the Packers were a deeply flawed 13-3 team that the San Francisco 49ers exposed in the regular season and the playoffs. But this is a team that’s built to win now, and taking full advantage of Rodgers’ final seasons is the obvious priority when it comes to team building.

It’s all the more reason the Packers should look anywhere but quarterback in the upcoming draft.

View photos

Is it wise to spend a high pick on a quarterback when Aaron Rodgers is still around? (AP Photo/Mike Roemer)

Where the Packers need help

Making the most of Rodgers’ final seasons means landing him and head coach Matt LaFleur talent that can contribute now.

Like defensive help over the middle after getting thrashed by the 49ers’ running game. Or finding Rodgers some downfield help on offense so he’s not dependent on targeting Davante Adams 10 times per game.

Drafting Rodgers’ successor sounds good …

The idea of having a successor ready for when Rodgers retires is appealing. The strategy’s worked for the Packers before when Rodgers sat on the bench for three seasons before taking over for Brett Favre.

But it’s an ultimate luxury. And it’s a luxury a team that needs help now can’t afford.

So, who would the Packers take?

The strategy also assumes that Gutekunst is going to get it right if he does pull the trigger on a first-round quarterback. Take Utah State’s Jordan Love for instance. Yahoo Sports draft guru Eric Edholm doesn’t think Love is out of the question.

But even the best front-office minds in football are rolling the dice when they draft a quarterback. Regularly predicting long-term professional success at the position is an elusive skill, if it even exists at all. Will a guy like Love — or any quarterback available at No. 30 — be a surefire starter?

No. Otherwise, he wouldn’t be available at No. 30. There’s no guarantee the guy going No. 1 will have NFL success.

View photos

Would Brian Gutekunst seriously consider taking a quarterback in the first round? (Larry Radloff/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

There’s no reason for Gutekunst to get tricky here. Take a cue from Ben Roethlisberger, who publicly questioned the Pittsburgh Steelers when they spent a third-round pick on Mason Rudolph in the 2018 draft.

Stop worrying about the quarterback of the future when you’ve got a guy still capable of winning now. Otherwise, just tear everything down and get the rebuild started.

I’m still trying to figure out how to shift this Bobby Lane curse onto the Packers. Hope they draft a QB in the first…and he SUCKS!

1 Like

I think a good GM is always looking down the road and has a viable #2 QB plan.

Personally I think PiT made the right call on Rudolph.

The way I look at it… If your always grooming a QB than you have options if your starter goes down. If the starter doesn’t then at some point you have trade bait. Especially if you can buy low and sell high.

3 Likes

Maybe they’re in the midst of a Favre curse and don’t know it? I mean sure, they won a Super Bowl since he left, but he was still playing then, wasn’t he? Maybe it didn’t take effect until he retired? They’ve had some heartbreaking (or warming, for me) playoff losses since.

1 Like

LOL - prayers, my brother.

p.s. Screw GB

grooming a QB if your starter goes down…are you talking just back up role type QB’s?

isn’t that what we’re doing with Blough/ grooming him?

I have no problem taking a QB -if trying to improve over Blough. but I don’t see a SURE QB that can be heir to Stafford --this offseason anyway.

Sure that’s what we’re doing with Blough (I guess) …but … I’m really talking about grooming a guy with an NFL caliber arm and a little more god given talent than Blough has. A potential future NFL starter type. Personally I wasn’t all that impressed with Blough. He has a weaker arm and his accuracy was definitely a problem. I like his athleticism though.

Kinda the same argument I was making with Marvin Hall in another thread. I’m not opposed to having a guy like that as our roster bubble guy. In this case as a 3rd string QB. But I prefer a guy at #2 that can push the starter and be groomed to be a future starter.

I personally think Marvin Hall and David Blough will always be back-up, roster bubble types. They both have concerns about them that are difficult to fix.

Jeff Driskel was the number two for a reason. He brings more to the table (in terms of talent) than Blough does. I think one could argue that he could develop into a future starter. He has a decent arm, good size and he’s athletic. He’s still relatively young at 26 so there’s plenty of time for him to grow as a player. But there’s enough issues in his game that are a serious concern for me as our back-up. Personally I’d prefer it if Driskel was our 3rd string guy and we had someone a little better at #2.

You should be very worried if your GM thinks that this is a good draft for QB’s.